The Teaching Method Doesn’t Define the Classroom

Teacher A:  Tell me about your class.

Me:  Well, I use mainly direct instruction and really focus on learning strategies to help students retain information.

I immediately feel judged.  As teaching methods go, I increasingly find myself in the minority.  I’m “old-school”.  My desks are in rows.  For the most part, I lecture.  There’s almost always a google slides presentation.  I am a dying breed of teacher.  Most mainstream education reformers welcome the death.  How could I possibly be preparing my students for the world of tomorrow?  My student’s profession won’t require them to sit in rows and listen to lecture, so why is my teaching method so?  I often hear this adage: “We’re preparing our students for jobs that don’t yet exist.”  Well, if that’s true, how can you be so certain your instructional methods are correct and my direct instruction is ruining their future?  As a side note, I’m currently crafting an article on why direct instruction is best for novice learners.  But I digress…My class must be boring and stale…think Ferris Bueller’s economics teacher (Ben Stein) in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.  How could I possibly be reaching the youth of America adequately?

Now that you’ve been primed with images of Ben Stein, let me ask you about your prototype of the direct instruction teacher.  I probably don’t fit the mold.  I dare say I “get” my high school students…although, I don’t understand some of their slang terminology and I’ll never have a snapchat account.  However, I quite successfully relate to them.  I’m an energetic 33, somewhat athletic, and have been told multiple times that I’m a “cool” teacher…not sure how I feel about that one.  I tell the corniest jokes in class that make them shake their head in shame, but they respect me for it.  My students know about my wife and three children.  I tell them about my weekend with my family and any funny stories that accurately depict the awesomeness of my 3 children.  I hang my kid’s artwork from home all over my walls at school.  I invest in a relationship with my students and they return the favor.

Unfortunately, I believe there’s an idea out there that direct instruction must be cold, boring, and ineffective.  Can it be?  Of course.  A stereotype is a stereotype for a reason.  But I guess what I’m saying is the teaching method doesn’t create either the environment of the classroom or the worth of the teacher.  The personality of the teacher creates the environment, which then shapes the identity of the classroom.  Although my AP Psychology class covers about 800 pages of a textbook in a semester in preparation for the exam, my class is known as being a light-hearted and interesting class.  How could a mostly lecture-based class be either light-hearted or interesting?  Now, certainly some of that has to do with the material…psychology is such an enthralling course.  In fact, I think Intro to Psych or AP Psychology courses are the best school learning environment.  But certainly some of the reason my AP Psychology course has grown in 5 years from 1 class of 25 students to now 5 classes of 35 students each has to do with me…right?  While I am not an advocate for “make everything fun” teaching, (In fact, I think that style of teaching may be hindering our students.) there’s no reason to make the class overtly and purposefully vapid either.

Maybe we should find out more about a teacher’s class than their teaching method before we judge their worth.  Teachers shouldn’t be completely defined by their methods.  We bring so much more to the table than that.

Or maybe I should just trust the data, be more secure with my classroom, and less impacted by others’ judgement.

Whatever.

5 thoughts on “The Teaching Method Doesn’t Define the Classroom

  1. Tom Whalen

    You are the man! Probably because you and I are alike in our evil methods. We are destroying creativity according to “Sir” Ken Robinson. He should know, as he has never taught before. He will guide us to an uncertain future.
    Thanks for your posts. You are not crazy.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thank you for the kind words…one cannot be creative without a base level of knowledge on a particular subject. I actually heard someone try to argue a week or so ago that collaborative grouping and using all the buzzwords/bells and whistles was the best way to learn a new subject. I couldn’t believe it.

    Like

  3. Cgs

    Thank you for describing many of the elements of my classroom. I make my students work, but I also make them laugh. I genuinely like them which I think is the key to any successful teaching experience. And most interesting is I have been teaching longer than you’ve been alive.

    Like

  4. All of the stuff I’ve seen change in 8 years in our field has never, and will never make a difference without a strong relationship with my students. Everything else, and I do mean everything is a waste of you’re not constantly trying to understand their lives and what matters to them. Although it’s getting harder and harder to do in this new world order, shit your door and reach your kids the way you’ve always done.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s